Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2010867
 
 

Footnotes (200)



 


 



Overcoming Neoliberal Hegemony in Community Development: Law, Planning, and Selected Lamarckism


Jerrold A. Long


University of Idaho College of Law

February 24, 2012

44 Urban Lawyer 345-398 (2012)

Abstract:     
Law constrains our behavior, both individually and collectively. Legitimate law is that law that emerges from an inclusive process that identifies a governed community’s collectively imagined future for a place, while respecting the concerns of necessarily oppressed minority interests. In the land use context, we use comprehensive land-use plans to identify and communicate a vision that motivates binding behavioral changes — i.e., plans create visions that are sufficiently attractive to motivate communities to act in meaningful ways. To the extent law emerges from an inclusive and effective community plan, it is legitimated by that plan. But a planning process that relies exclusively on letting visions emerge from a community necessarily prefers those visions that provide individual economic benefits to specific participants — e.g., the growth machine. Public goods — even public goods that might represent the “best” vision for a particular community — are not championed, supported, or developed in the planning process. Combined with a general trend toward neoliberal governance, and the weak legal position of comprehensive plans, this inherent preference for the growth machine over the public good yields land-use ordinances that are unrelated to what might be the best vision for a community. The remedy is twofold. If planning’s purpose is to achieve public goods, planners must be willing to represent the unrepresented, potentially forcing particular visions on communities during the planning process rather than waiting for private-good-driven visions to emerge, at least initially. And the forced visions must be sufficiently specific so as to limit the universe of legal choices, and land-use consequences, that result. If the forced vision is useful — if it is a public good — the community will adopt it. Without the forced vision, it does not have that opportunity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: Land Use, Comprehensive Planning, Neoliberalism, Public Goods

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 25, 2012 ; Last revised: May 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Long, Jerrold A., Overcoming Neoliberal Hegemony in Community Development: Law, Planning, and Selected Lamarckism (February 24, 2012). 44 Urban Lawyer 345-398 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2010867 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2010867

Contact Information

Jerrold A. Long (Contact Author)
University of Idaho College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 442321
Moscow, ID 83844-2321
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 981
Downloads: 90
Download Rank: 167,158
Footnotes:  200

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.218 seconds