Abstract

 


 



To Be or Not to Be...A Scientist?


Arnaud Chevalier


University of London - Royal Holloway College


IZA Discussion Paper No. 6353

Abstract:     
Policy makers generally advocate that to remain competitive countries need to train more scientists. Employers regularly complain of qualified scientist shortages blaming the higher wages in other occupations for luring graduates out of scientific occupations. Using a survey of recent British graduates from Higher Education we report that fewer than 50% of science graduates work in a scientific occupation three years after graduation. The wage premium observed for science graduates stems from occupational choice rather than a science degree. Accounting for selection into subject and occupation, the returns to working in a scientific occupation reaches 18% and there is no return to a science degree outside scientific occupations. Finally, scientists working in a scientific occupation are more satisfied with their educational and career choices, which suggests that those not working in these occupations have been pushed out of careers in science.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: science, graduate, labour market

JEL Classification: I21, J24, J44

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 25, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Chevalier, Arnaud, To Be or Not to Be...A Scientist?. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6353. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2010948

Contact Information

Arnaud Chevalier (Contact Author)
University of London - Royal Holloway College ( email )
Senate House
Malet Street
London, TW20 0EX
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 216
Downloads: 26

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.219 seconds