|
||||
|
||||
Measuring the UnmeasurableKim R. SawyerUniversity of Melbourne - School of Historical and Philosophical Studies Howard SankeyUniversity of Melbourne - School of Historical and Philosophical Studies Ric LombardoRMIT University February 25, 2012 Abstract: Galileo suggested that what is not measurable be made measurable. It is this principle which underscores an unwritten law of both the sciences and the social sciences that it is better to measure than not to measure. But, the assumption of measurability is rarely considered. In this paper, we consider a set of invariance and continuity conditions which a measure should satisfy. These conditions provide a test of whether a given mapping onto the real line constitutes a measure, and not simply an arbitrary mapping. They represent a test for measurability. In the social sciences, it is common to construct measures based on multi-dimensional attributes. In the paper, we characterise this multi-dimensional measurement as portfolios, with weights determined a priori. Measurement becomes a process of convergence towards a preferred measure which anchors the measurement. Measurement is valid if there is convergence to a measure satisfying the invariance and continuity conditions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32 Keywords: Measurability, invariance, continuity, anchoring, convergence JEL Classification: C60, C80 working papers seriesDate posted: February 26, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.375 seconds