Deductions for Drug Ads? The Constitution Does Not Require Congress to Subsidize Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertisements
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Boston University School of Law
February 27, 2012
Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 52, p. 453, 2012
Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-11
The First Amendment protects lawful, non-misleading advertising as commercial speech, which constrains Congressional attempts to regulate direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs. But the Constitution does not require the federal government to subsidize advertising through the Tax Code. Congress could revoke the legislative gift of tax deductions for DTCA without running afoul of regulating speech. While DTCA proponents maintain that DTCA increases disease awareness and leads to more doctor-patient conversations, Congress could find that these purported benefits are outweighed by other negative consequences, including excessive prescribing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: First Amendment, Commercial Speech, Direct to Consumer Advertising, DTCA, Tax Law, Excessive Prescribing
JEL Classification: K19, K20, K23, K32, K34, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 27, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 1.235 seconds