|
||||
|
||||
Diachronic Constitutionalism: A Remedy for the Court's Originalist FixationGeoffrey Schotteraffiliation not provided to SSRN 2010 Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, p. 1241, 2010 Abstract: ABSTRACTThe article focuses on the interpretation of constitutional provisions by judges by the original meaning of the law. It presents the views of professor Lawrence Solum on the role of original meaning in constitutional interpretation and his fixation thesis. It discusses the U.S. court cases, District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, and a diachronic theory of constitutional meaning proposed to bridge the gap between the historical fact and the normative law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 107 Keywords: Constitution, Second Amendment, Originalism, Living Constitutionalism, Diachronic, Synchronic, DC v. Heller, McDonald v. Chicago, Scalia, Stevens, Solum Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 29, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds