Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (215)



 


 



Diachronic Constitutionalism: A Remedy for the Court's Originalist Fixation


Geoffrey Schotter


affiliation not provided to SSRN

2010

Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, p. 1241, 2010

Abstract:     
ABSTRACTThe article focuses on the interpretation of constitutional provisions by judges by the original meaning of the law. It presents the views of professor Lawrence Solum on the role of original meaning in constitutional interpretation and his fixation thesis. It discusses the U.S. court cases, District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, and a diachronic theory of constitutional meaning proposed to bridge the gap between the historical fact and the normative law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 107

Keywords: Constitution, Second Amendment, Originalism, Living Constitutionalism, Diachronic, Synchronic, DC v. Heller, McDonald v. Chicago, Scalia, Stevens, Solum

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 29, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Schotter, Geoffrey, Diachronic Constitutionalism: A Remedy for the Court's Originalist Fixation (2010). Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, p. 1241, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2012703

Contact Information

Geoffrey Schotter (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 439
Downloads: 76
Download Rank: 161,383
Footnotes:  215

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds