Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2014126
 


 



Punitive Damages in Cyberspace: Where in the World Is the Consumer?


Michael L. Rustad


Suffolk University Law School; Stetson University - College of Law

March 1, 2012

Chapman Law Review, Vol. 7, p. 39, 2004
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper Series

Abstract:     
This Article presents the results of the first empirical study of the role that punitive damages have played in redressing consumer injuries during the first decade of Internet-related litigation. This article examines the case characteristics of Internet lawsuits where plaintiffs initiated causes of action in state and federal courts in the United States between 1992 and 2002. The analysis of plaintiffs’ victories in Internet cases has a domestic focus, employing a database that includes virtually all U.S. plaintiff victories in Internet cases. This database permits the first comprehensive examination of: (1) the frequency of punitive damages in Internet cases; (2) the specific causes of action on which the remedy was based; (3) plaintiff and defendant characteristics; and (4) the role punitive damages plays in the cyber-litigation system. A content analysis of all Internet-related cases reveals that no consumer obtained punitive damages during a decade of cyberlaw litigation. Tort remedies have the potential of filling the gap left by ineffective criminal sanctions against cyberwrongs such as online stalking. Public enforcement needs to be augmented by consumers operating as “private attorneys general” who pursue punitive justice against cyberlaw wrongdoers. At present, punitive damages serve as a form of corporate self-help to assist corporations in protecting rights and consolidating market share in cyberspace. I explore the reasons why punitive damages have not yet developed as a consumer protection remedy in cyberspace. This Article will demonstrate that punitive damages are a necessary consumer remedy against Internet wrongdoers where the probability of discovery is low and the harm to consumers is generally undetected and unpunished by public authorities.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 2, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Rustad, Michael L., Punitive Damages in Cyberspace: Where in the World Is the Consumer? (March 1, 2012). Chapman Law Review, Vol. 7, p. 39, 2004; Suffolk University Law School Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2014126

Contact Information

Michael L. Rustad (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States

Stetson University - College of Law ( email )
1401 61st Street South
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 630
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 171,850

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds