Abstract

 


 



Congressional Silence and the Statutory Interpretation Game


Paul J. Stancil


University of Illinois College of Law

March 2, 2012

54 William & Mary Law Review 1251 (2013)

Abstract:     
This Article explores the circumstances under which the federal legislative apparatus may be unable to respond to a politically objectionable statutory interpretation from the Supreme Court. The Article builds upon existing economic models of statutory interpretation, for the first time incorporating transaction costs into the analysis. The Article concludes by identifying recent real-world disputes in which transaction costs constrained Congress and the President from overriding the Court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 87

Keywords: statutory interpretation, law and economics, transaction costs, model, spatial model, congressional silence, game theory, pivotal politics, positive political theory, congressional override, legislative override

JEL Classification: H1, H11

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 4, 2012 ; Last revised: May 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Stancil, Paul J., Congressional Silence and the Statutory Interpretation Game (March 2, 2012). 54 William & Mary Law Review 1251 (2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2014793 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2014793

Contact Information

Paul J. Stancil (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 248
Downloads: 28

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds