Retirement Assets to a Surviving Spouse – Rollovers and Portability are Your First Choice

Probate & Property, p. 21, January/February 2012

6 Pages Posted: 4 Mar 2012 Last revised: 7 Jun 2012

See all articles by Christopher R. Hoyt

Christopher R. Hoyt

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law

Date Written: January 2, 2012

Abstract

This article examines the pros and cons of naming either a spouse or a trust for a spouse as the beneficiary of a retirement account. It integrates income tax planning with estate planning and recommends arrangements that will produce the best overall outcome.

Rollovers can pose challenges. For couples in a second marriage, there is no way to assure that the surviving spouse will leave any remaining rollover assets to the children of the deceased spouse’s prior marriage. An estate tax problem is that the rollover assets could inflate the size of the surviving spouse’s taxable estate. Thus, estate planners might recommend a QTIP trust or a credit-shelter/bypass trust.

The income tax problem caused by naming a trust for a spouse as the beneficiary of a retirement account is that the required minimum distribution (“RMD”) laws will usually require the account to be liquidated over the surviving spouse’s remaining life expectancy. The implication for the 50% of surviving spouses who live longer than their original projected life expectancy: the tax laws will require the inherited retirement account to be completely liquidated while they are still alive and at a time when they might need money to pay medical or long-term care expenses. By comparison, a rollover of a deceased’s spouse’s account to a surviving spouse allows ample resources to remain in the account for the surviving spouse’s entire lifetime because of much smaller RMDs.

The article then examines how the new “portability” estate tax law permits married couples to get the income tax advantage of a rollover and avoid the estate tax problem. For elderly couples and for couples in a second marriage, the article demonstrates how a two-generation charitable remainder trust can do for retirement assets what a credit-shelter/bypass trust does for conventional assets.

Keywords: tax, income tax, estate tax, portability, IRA, retirement account, 401(k), pension, RMD, MRD, rollover, charitable remainder trust, CRT, QTIP, credit shelter trust, bypass trust, second marriage, divorce

JEL Classification: K34, D31, G23, H20, H24

Suggested Citation

Hoyt, Christopher R., Retirement Assets to a Surviving Spouse – Rollovers and Portability are Your First Choice (January 2, 2012). Probate & Property, p. 21, January/February 2012 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2014996

Christopher R. Hoyt (Contact Author)

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law ( email )

5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,084
Abstract Views
3,321
Rank
37,798
PlumX Metrics