Interstate Competition and the Race to the Top
Jonathan H. Adler
Case Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
March 2, 2012
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 35, No. 1
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-7
This essay, based on remarks at the 2011 Federalist Society Student Symposium, discusses some of the benefits of federalism. Many of the benefits of federalism derive from interjurisdictional competition, as competition among jurisdictions is a powerful means to discover and promote welfare-enhancing policies. Decentralizing authority over various policy matters also leaves states free to account for regional variation and can facilitate policy discovery and entrepreneurship and reduce the risks of policy failures. While the arguments for decentralization are strong, there are persuasive justifications for federal intervention in some instances, such as the existence of interstate spillovers. Fears of a “race to the bottom” is not a persuasive justification for federal intervention, and federal intervention to prevent such a “race” can hamper welfare-enhancing interjurisdictional competition.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Keywords: federalism, interjurisdictional competition, decentralization, Clean Air Act, environmental law, race to the bottom, race to the top, interstate pollution, interstate spillover, wetlands
JEL Classification: K23, K32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 8, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.485 seconds