Discretionary vs. Mandatory Prosecution: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Comparative Criminal Procedure
University of Hawaii at Hilo
Keio University - Faculty of Economics
March 4, 2012
Asian Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, Article 6, 2012
Using a game-theoretic model of criminal procedure, we investigate relative merits and demerits between discretionary and mandatory prosecution. The game illustrates a prosecutor's dilemma associated with his two tasks: evidence production and case screening. Discretionary prosecution makes use of incriminating evidence to dispose of weak cases, but it may suffer the moral-hazard problem in evidence production more seriously than mandatory prosecution. Our welfare analyses suggest that mandatory prosecution outperforms discretionary prosecution when evidence transmission from the prosecutor to the judge is accurate and/or when the cost of litigation incurred by the prosecutor is large.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: discretionary prosecution, mandatory prosecution, case screening, evidence production
JEL Classification: D02, D73, K41
Date posted: March 4, 2012 ; Last revised: December 2, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.796 seconds