Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2016020
 
 

Footnotes (41)



 


 



Defending Equilibrium Adjustment


Orin S. Kerr


George Washington University - Law School

March 5, 2012

Harvard Law Review, Vol. 125, 2012
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-28
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2012-28

Abstract:     
This short article for the Harvard Law Review Forum replies to an essay by Professor Christopher Slobogin, An Original Take on Originalism, 125 Harv. L. Rev. F. 14 (2011), which was itself a response to a recent article, Orin S. Kerr, An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 476 (2011). In this reply, Professor Kerr explains why equilibrium-adjustment is not originalism, and shows how originalist and non-originalist approaches to interpreting the Fourth Amendment can coexist using equilbrium adjustment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: fourth amendment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 5, 2012 ; Last revised: March 28, 2012

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., Defending Equilibrium Adjustment (March 5, 2012). Harvard Law Review, Vol. 125, 2012; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-28; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2012-28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2016020

Contact Information

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-4775 (Phone)
202-994-9817 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.asp?ID=3568
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 843
Downloads: 115
Download Rank: 141,819
Footnotes:  41
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment
By Orin Kerr

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.812 seconds