|
||||
|
||||
Why Not Adopt a Loser-Pays-All Rule in Criminal Litigation?Nuno M. GaroupaUniversity of Illinois College of Law Luciana EchazuClarkson University January 5, 2012 International Review of Law and Economics, 2012 Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS12-03 Abstract: In this paper we consider the potential effects that the application of a loser-pays-all rule may have on criminal litigation, including the decision to prosecute, criminal deterrence and legal error. We find that the effects of fee shifting on deterrence and on miscarriage of justice go in opposite directions. We also look at the effects of this rule on the rate of settlements (plea-bargaining) and when one party is wealth-constrained. We apply the insights of our model to current policy discussions such as the use of RICO proceedings and the financing of enforcement authorities in the United States.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29 Keywords: loser-pays-all rule, fee shifting, prosecutor, criminal litigation JEL Classification: K1, K4 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 6, 2012 ; Last revised: September 12, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds