Why Not Adopt a Loser-Pays-All Rule in Criminal Litigation?
Nuno M. Garoupa
Texas A&M University School of Law; Catholic University of Portugal (UCP) - Católica Global School of Law
January 5, 2012
International Review of Law and Economics, 2012
Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS12-03
In this paper we consider the potential effects that the application of a loser-pays-all rule may have on criminal litigation, including the decision to prosecute, criminal deterrence and legal error. We find that the effects of fee shifting on deterrence and on miscarriage of justice go in opposite directions. We also look at the effects of this rule on the rate of settlements (plea-bargaining) and when one party is wealth-constrained. We apply the insights of our model to current policy discussions such as the use of RICO proceedings and the financing of enforcement authorities in the United States.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: loser-pays-all rule, fee shifting, prosecutor, criminal litigation
JEL Classification: K1, K4
Date posted: March 6, 2012 ; Last revised: September 12, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds