Sustainability Innovation Contests: Evaluating Contributions with an Eco Impact-Innovativeness Typology
Erik G. Hansen
Leuphana University Lüneburg - Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM)
Angelika Cosima Bullinger
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; University of Pennsylvania - School of Arts & Sciences
Technische Universität München - TUM Business School
International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Vol. 5, Nos. 2/3, 2011
Companies operating in business-to-consumer markets have been increasingly pressured to transcend the focus on economic and technological innovations and to address more environmental-friendly and socially desirable products and services, i.e. to engage in Sustainability-oriented Innovation (SOI). This paper examines the suitability of innovation contests to generate SOIs and the resulting degree of innovativeness in conventional and ecological terms. Using a case study of an innovation contest in the shoe industry, we derive three strands of results. First, a large majority of the submissions belongs to the category of product care. Second, submissions categorised as ‘greenwashing’ receive a better average assessment, although technically equal to the ones of product care. Third, using eco-impact class as the first axis, and the (conventional) innovativeness criteria – as judged by the experts – as the second axis, we develop an eco impact-innovativeness grid. It illustrates that a vast majority of user submissions falls into the classes incremental innovation and radical conventional innovation. Results go beyond previous studies and thus contribute to the fields of open innovation and SOI.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: open innovation, eco innovation, sustainability innovation, innovation process, fuzzy frontend, idea management, idea contest, creativity, evaluation, innovativeness, case study, shoe industry
JEL Classification: Q31, Q32
Date posted: May 2, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.188 seconds