|
||||
|
||||
What Would Congress Want? If We Want to Know, Why Not Ask?Danieli EvansYale Law School; Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School March 1, 2012 University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 81, 2013 Abstract: This is the first proposed procedure that would enable the Court to take account of congressional preferences in a pending statutory interpretation decision, without requiring Congress to go through the resource and time consuming process of amending the ambiguous law. In “hard cases” the Court could certify, through a fast-track procedure, a question presenting Congress with two multiple choices that the Court predetermines to be viable readings of the statute. This procedure avoids constitutional problems because congressional input is voluntary and non-binding for both branches, and judicial constraint enforces rule of law and constitutional values.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52 Keywords: legislation, statutory interpretation, congress, judicial administration Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 6, 2012 ; Last revised: March 17, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds