Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (127)



 


 



What Would Congress Want? If We Want to Know, Why Not Ask?


Danieli Evans


Yale Law School; Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School

March 1, 2012

University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 81, 2013

Abstract:     
This is the first proposed procedure that would enable the Court to take account of congressional preferences in a pending statutory interpretation decision, without requiring Congress to go through the resource and time consuming process of amending the ambiguous law. In “hard cases” the Court could certify, through a fast-track procedure, a question presenting Congress with two multiple choices that the Court predetermines to be viable readings of the statute. This procedure avoids constitutional problems because congressional input is voluntary and non-binding for both branches, and judicial constraint enforces rule of law and constitutional values.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: legislation, statutory interpretation, congress, judicial administration

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 6, 2012 ; Last revised: March 17, 2013

Suggested Citation

Evans, Danieli, What Would Congress Want? If We Want to Know, Why Not Ask? (March 1, 2012). University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 81, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2016951 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2016951

Contact Information

Danieli Evans (Contact Author)
Yale Law School
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School ( email )
127 Wall St
New Haven, CT 06520
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.culturalcognition.net/danieli-evans-homepage/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 519
Downloads: 37
Footnotes:  127

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds