Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2017319
 


 



Folklore and Folklanguage: Myth or Reality?


Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay


Indian Statistical Institute

June 6, 1995

FOLKLORE AND FOLKLANGUAGE: MYTH OR REALITY?, West Bengal, Kalyani University, 1995

Abstract:     
The author maintained that the construction of the category "folk" was born out of super-ordinate's essentialist gaze that de-sign-ates otherness in the form of a discipline, “Folklore”. The dichotomous divisions between folk -- non-folk, tribe -- non-tribe, civil-savage, sastriya--loukika typically reflect the colonial pedagogy that constitute otherness by deploying different exonyms to peripheral other ignoring the ethno/endonyms as used by a community from their subject-position. These divisions between dominant centre and dominated periphery gave birth to some surrogated subjects like "Folklore" or "Anthropology" in contrast to the white men's epistemological fields like History, Sociology or Physiology. These subjects subjectify as well as objectify dominated and peripheral "other" in the way of surrogating the “scientific” construction of "human beings".

The problem is with the imaginative boundary between these two. One must keep in mind, from the standpoint of enlightened science, that the limit or boundary of different epistemological fields needs to be enumerated or well defined, i.e., in this case, the binaries like Folk language/language, folk-art/non-folk-art, Folksong/Classical song, Folk drama/theatre must be distinguished according to the existing enlightened “scientific” logic. However the construction of such boundary, diachronically, is not always transparent, but rather fuzzy; and on the other hand it reflects a tension of maintaining the boundary.

The author showed the nature of linguistic imperialism as evident in the terms like “dialect”, “folk-language” or “standard language”. The author also showed the constitution of Folklore and Anthropology as colonially derived disciplines that surrogate white men’s History and Sociology. The author illustrated the fuzziness of such boundaries that reveal the nature of subsumption through subjectification (birth of a discipline), objectification (a group of people are treated/categorized and analyzed as a stable object) as well as subjection (others’ bodies are under the control of the centre).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: de-sign, designation, anti-language

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 12, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Bandyopadhyay, Debaprasad, Folklore and Folklanguage: Myth or Reality? (June 6, 1995). FOLKLORE AND FOLKLANGUAGE: MYTH OR REALITY?, West Bengal, Kalyani University, 1995 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2017319

Contact Information

Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay (Contact Author)
Indian Statistical Institute ( email )
203 B.T. Road
Baranagar
Kolkata, West Bengal 700108
India
+919830630707 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://plus.google.com/105852625753454780106/about
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,162
Downloads: 80
Download Rank: 179,696
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.219 seconds