|
||||
|
||||
The Language of CrimePeter TiersmaLoyola Law School Los Angeles Lawrence M. SolanBrooklyn Law School March 7, 2012 THE LANGUAGE OF CRIME, Peter M. Tiersma, Lawrence M. Solan, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, 2012 Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 263 Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-14 Abstract: Many crimes are generally performed by using language. Among them are solicitation, conspiracy, perjury, threatening, and bribery. In this chapter, we look at these crimes as acts of speech, and find that they have much in common – and a few interesting differences. For one thing, they involve different acts of speech, ranging from promises to orders. For another, most language crimes can be committed through indirect speech. Few criminals will say, “I hereby offer you a bribe,” or “I hereby engage you to kill my spouse.” Thus, many of the legal battles involve the extent to which courts may draw inferences of communicative intent from language that does not literally appear to be criminal. Yet the legal system draws a line in the sand when it comes to perjury, a crime that can only be committed through a direct fabrication. We provide a structured discussion of these various crimes that should serve to explain the similarities and difference among them.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 27 Keywords: crime, speech act, sincerity, perjury, bribery, solicitation, threats Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 8, 2012 ; Last revised: March 29, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.469 seconds