Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2017768
 
 

Footnotes (162)



 


 



Alternative Dispute Resolution in Land Use Disputes — Two Continents
and Two Approaches


Edward J. Sullivan


Portland State University

Alexia Solomou


University of Cambridge - Lauterpacht Centre for International Law

November 17, 2011

The Urban Lawyer, Vol. 43, No. 4, p. 1036, Fall 2011

Abstract:     
This paper notes the increasing use of alternative dispute resolution ("ADR"), which includes negotiations among parties, mediation, and arbitration) generally and specifically examines its use in resolving planning controversies in two jurisdictions -- England and Wales in the United Kingdom and the State of Oregon in the United States. ADR is less expensive, more efficient, and may well result in a more satisfactory outcome to the parties. In the United States, the siting of locally unwanted land uses ("LULUs"), property rights, and litigation pose profound conflicts for the land use process. In the United Kingdom, initial issuance of permits without hearings, local resistance to major public works projects (such as airport runways and power plants) and lengthy and costly planning inquiries are similar concerns. ADR may be helpful in the resolution of these disputes.

After briefly examining the legal structure of the two planning systems, the authors provide concrete examples of ADR in Oregon (a system that tends to be more informal and geared to solutions in individual cases) and examine the proposed new structure of ADR in planning law in the United Kingdom, including the recent and thoughtful "green paper" on the subject.

The two systems are compared and recommendations are provided.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: alternative dispute resolution, land use planning, Oregon, United Kingdom

JEL Classification: R52

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 8, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Sullivan, Edward J. and Solomou, Alexia, Alternative Dispute Resolution in Land Use Disputes — Two Continents and Two Approaches (November 17, 2011). The Urban Lawyer, Vol. 43, No. 4, p. 1036, Fall 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2017768

Contact Information

Edward J. Sullivan (Contact Author)
Portland State University ( email )
United States
HOME PAGE: http://gsblaw.com
Alexia Solomou
University of Cambridge - Lauterpacht Centre for International Law ( email )
Lauterpacht Centre for International Law
5 Cranmer Centre
Cambridge, CB3 9BL
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 808
Downloads: 124
Download Rank: 136,225
Footnotes:  162

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds