Kickbacks, Honest Services, and Health Care Fraud after Skilling
Joan H. Krause
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law
August 8, 2012
Annals of Health Law, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2012
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018589
This essay considers how the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Skilling v. United States, which limited the situations in which mail and wire fraud cases may be premised on violations of the “intangible right to honest services,” has the potential to alter the future of health care fraud litigation. While Skilling is widely perceived to have closed the door to several types of common mail and wire fraud prosecutions, this may not turn out to be the case in health care. In health care, the renewed focus on kickbacks as evidence of an honest services breach instead may dovetail nicely with both the Obama Administration’s emphasis on criminal health care fraud enforcement and the jurisprudence of the Medicare & Medicaid Anti-Kickback Statute. This kind of leverage may prove very difficult for prosecutors to resist, and most certainly will require changes in the way the health law bar approaches common Anti-Kickback concerns.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: health care fraud, Medicare, white collar crimeAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 8, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.656 seconds