Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2018623
 


 



How Written Advocacy Shapes Doctrine (Part I): Did Bad Briefing Decide Lochner v. New York?


Douglas E. Abrams


University of Missouri School of Law

March 8, 2012

Precedent, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 24-27, Winter 2012
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-03

Abstract:     
Professor Abrams authors a column, Writing It Right, in Precedent, the Missouri Bar's quarterly magazine. In a variety of contexts, the column stresses the fundamentals of quality legal writing - precision, conciseness, simplicity and clarity. Future columns will be posted as they are published, every three months or so.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: advocacy, doctrine, briefs, brief, briefing, Lochner

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 9, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Abrams, Douglas E., How Written Advocacy Shapes Doctrine (Part I): Did Bad Briefing Decide Lochner v. New York? (March 8, 2012). Precedent, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 24-27, Winter 2012; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2018623

Contact Information

Douglas E. Abrams (Contact Author)
University of Missouri School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
573-882-0307 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 406
Downloads: 32

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds