Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2019079
 
 

Footnotes (273)



 


 



The New Intrusion


Jane R. Bambauer


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

March 9, 2012

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 88, 2012
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 265

Abstract:     
The tort of intrusion upon seclusion offers the best theory to target legitimate privacy harms in the information age. This Article introduces a new taxonomy that organizes privacy regulations across four key stages of information flow - observation, capture (the creation of a record), dissemination, and use. Privacy scholars typically propose placing constraints on the dissemination and re-use of personal information, and these dominant models are at the heart of President Obama’s Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights. But these restrictions conflict with the First Amendment and other important shared values. Instead, observation is the most promising stage for legal intervention.

Intrusion imposes liability for conduct - offensive observations. The tort is theoretically coherent and constitutionally sound because an individual’s interests in seclusion co-exist comfortably with society’s interests in data dissemination. This puts intrusion in stark contrast with other privacy models, where the alleged harm is a direct consequence of an increase in knowledge. The classic intrusion tort can adapt sensibly to new technologies when it is reduced to two essential elements: (1) an observation, (2) that is offensive. This approach vindicates privacy law’s historical roots in torts and offers a path to principled privacy regulation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: privacy, information privacy, data privacy, Fair Information Practices, intrusion, intrusion upon seclusion, confidentiality, privacy torts, Prosser, Warren and Brandeis, First Amendment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 9, 2012 ; Last revised: March 13, 2014

Suggested Citation

Bambauer, Jane R., The New Intrusion (March 9, 2012). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 88, 2012; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 265. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2019079

Contact Information

Jane R. Yakowitz Bambauer (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,592
Downloads: 229
Download Rank: 76,622
Footnotes:  273

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds