Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2019190
 


 



Subsidizing 'Patent Roulette'


Brian J. Love


Santa Clara University School of Law

March 5, 2012

Op-Ed, Indianapolis Star, March 5, 2012, at A13
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2019190

Abstract:     
A recent report in Purdue University’s daily newspaper reveals that the school is losing money from a seemingly unlikely source: its patent portfolio. The Midwestern research juggernaut, ranked among the top-twenty graduate programs in engineering, computer science, chemistry, and agriculture, can’t seem to make a buck licensing the hundreds of patents it receives annually on faculty and student innovations.

Each year U.S. universities like Purdue apply for thousands of patents, spending up to fifty thousand dollars in legal fees per application, even though the technologies disclosed in a minuscule percentage will become products, let alone profitable ones.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 1

Keywords: university technology transfer, university TTLO, university TTO, university patent, Purdue, Stanford, WARF, Myriad

JEL Classification: O34, K00

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 11, 2012 ; Last revised: May 28, 2012

Suggested Citation

Love, Brian J., Subsidizing 'Patent Roulette' (March 5, 2012). Op-Ed, Indianapolis Star, March 5, 2012, at A13; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2019190. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2019190

Contact Information

Brian J. Love (Contact Author)
Santa Clara University School of Law ( email )
500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara, CA 95053
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,522
Downloads: 123
Download Rank: 134,785
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds