Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2020020
 
 

Footnotes (262)



 


 



The Scarlet Letter: The Supreme Court and the Language of Abortion Stigma


Paula L. Abrams


Lewis & Clark Law School

February 1, 2012

Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, Vol. 19, 2013
Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-8

Abstract:     
This article examines how the Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence depicts abortion and the woman who seeks an abortion. It analyzes how narratives drawn from the Court’s abortion opinions attribute negative characteristics to women who decide to terminate their pregnancies. These narratives serve both expressive and normative functions, acting to re-enforce abortion stigma and narrow the constitutional legitimacy of reproductive freedom. Abortion stigma should be a concern for the Court, for its engendered judgment of women and for the burden it places on women who seek to exercise their constitutional rights.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: abortion, stigma, Supreme Court abortion narrative

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 12, 2012 ; Last revised: August 5, 2013

Suggested Citation

Abrams, Paula L., The Scarlet Letter: The Supreme Court and the Language of Abortion Stigma (February 1, 2012). Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, Vol. 19, 2013; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-8. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2020020

Contact Information

Paula L. Abrams (Contact Author)
Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
503-768-6632 (Phone)
503-768-6716 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 931
Downloads: 152
Download Rank: 115,378
Footnotes:  262

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.313 seconds