The Scarlet Letter: The Supreme Court and the Language of Abortion Stigma
Paula L. Abrams
Lewis & Clark Law School
February 1, 2012
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, Vol. 19, 2013
Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-8
This article examines how the Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence depicts abortion and the woman who seeks an abortion. It analyzes how narratives drawn from the Court’s abortion opinions attribute negative characteristics to women who decide to terminate their pregnancies. These narratives serve both expressive and normative functions, acting to re-enforce abortion stigma and narrow the constitutional legitimacy of reproductive freedom. Abortion stigma should be a concern for the Court, for its engendered judgment of women and for the burden it places on women who seek to exercise their constitutional rights.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: abortion, stigma, Supreme Court abortion narrativeAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 12, 2012 ; Last revised: August 5, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.453 seconds