Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (89)



 


 



Children’s Best Interests, Religion and Custody: A Complex Relationship


Sylvie Langlaude


Queen's University Belfast - School of Law


WELFARE OF THE CHILD AND BELIEFS OF THE PARENTS: BLOOD TRANSFUSION, RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AND CUSTODY, pp. 179-207, Achilles C. Emilianides eds., Nicosia: University of Nicosia Press, 2010

Abstract:     
This chapter, written in the context of the liberal standard of the legal regulation of families within democratic societies, considers parental disputes over the child’s religious upbringing. It tackles the two related issues of, first, the allocation of custody and access and, second, the regulation of the scope of custody and access. Both should be assessed in light of the best interests of the child. On the first issue, parental religious practices should not be a factor to consider unless there is harm to the child. The second issue raises questions of mono- and bi- religious upbringing and the introduction of the child to new religious practices. It is pointed out that, whilst the child’s best interests should be the relevant standard, there is no consensus on the function of the best interests test in religious matters and courts should consider any significant ties of the child with a religious community.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 12, 2012 ; Last revised: March 14, 2012

Suggested Citation

Langlaude, Sylvie, Children’s Best Interests, Religion and Custody: A Complex Relationship. WELFARE OF THE CHILD AND BELIEFS OF THE PARENTS: BLOOD TRANSFUSION, RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AND CUSTODY, pp. 179-207, Achilles C. Emilianides eds., Nicosia: University of Nicosia Press, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2020729

Contact Information

Sylvie Langlaude (Contact Author)
Queen's University Belfast - School of Law ( email )
School of Law
Belfast BT7 1NN, BT7 1NN
Ireland
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 249
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 198,748
Footnotes:  89
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.782 seconds