|
||||
|
||||
Unconstitutional Conditions: The Irrelevance of ConsentPhilip HamburgerColumbia University - Law School March 14, 2012 Virginia Law Review, Vol. 98, 2012 Abstract: Unconstitutional conditions constitute the Gordian Knot of constitutional law. The standard solution is to slice through the knot with consent — to conclude that consent excuses otherwise unconstitutional restrictions. The role of consent, however, needs to be reconsidered. Rather than a solution, consent is the source of confusion. The article concludes that private or state consent cannot justify the federal government in going beyond its legal limits. The Constitution’s limits on the government are legal limits imposed with the consent of the people. Therefore, neither private nor state consent can alter these limits or otherwise enlarge the federal government’s constitutional power.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 102 Keywords: constitution, unconstitutional conditions, rights, First Amendment Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 15, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.313 seconds