Footnotes (74)



The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and its Legitimacy

George Letsas

University College London - Faculty of Laws

March 14, 2012

The idea that the ECHR is a living instrument that must be interpreted according to present-day conditions has been a central feature of Strasbourg’s case law from its very early days. This paper begins by providing a general account of the way in which the European Court of Human Rights has understood and used evolutive interpretation, by looking at relevant case law and how it has developed over time (sections 2 and 3). It then moves on to discuss the rationale and justifiability of the doctrine, particularly in relation to the moral foundations of human rights (section 4). The second part of paper (section 5) addresses the general issue of the European Court's legitimacy over contracting states and the role that evolutive interpretation plays in arguments in favour and against legitimacy. It argues that commitment to evolutive interpretation is essential, rather than a threat, to the Court's legitimacy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), European Court of Human Rights, living instrument, evolutive interpretation, legitimacy, margin of appreciation, consensus

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: March 15, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Letsas, George, The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and its Legitimacy (March 14, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2021836 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2021836

Contact Information

George Letsas (Contact Author)
University College London - Faculty of Laws ( email )
London WC1E OEG
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,505
Downloads: 1,674
Download Rank: 4,728
Footnotes:  74

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.468 seconds