Patent Infringement as Criminal Conduct

Jacob S. Sherkow

New York Law School

December 17, 2012

Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 19, p. 1, 2012
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2022067

Criminal and civil law differ greatly in their use of the element of intent. The purposes of intent in each legal system are tailored to effectuate very different goals. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., 131 S. Ct. 2060 (2011), however, imported a criminal concept of intent — willful blindness — into the statute for patent infringement, a civil offense, despite these differences. This importation of a criminal law concept of intent into the patent statute is novel and calls for examination. This Article compares the purposes behind intent in criminal law with the purposes behind intent in patent law to demonstrate that this importation does not achieve the policy goals of the patent regime. Criminal law jurisprudence requires an intent element for three reasons: to ascribe a level of moral blameworthiness to an act, to separate criminal from civil liability, and to shield otherwise innocently acting defendants from criminal punishment. Patent infringement actions, by contrast, lack an intent element because they almost exclusively seek to remedy economic harms. The importation of criminal concepts of knowledge into the patent infringement statute may therefore lead to unwanted consequences, particularly, higher-than-warranted burdens of proof for patent holders. To this end, equating criminal mental states to civil ones risks treating patent infringement as criminal conduct. This Article concludes by proposing that courts should examine the purposes of mental state requirements on a statute-by-statute basis.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: patent, criminal law, crime, infringement, inducement, technology, intent, global-tech, willful blindness

JEL Classification: K10, K11, K14, O34

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 15, 2012 ; Last revised: December 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sherkow, Jacob S., Patent Infringement as Criminal Conduct (December 17, 2012). Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 19, p. 1, 2012; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2022067. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2022067

Contact Information

Jacob S. Sherkow (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
212.431.2355 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nyls.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/faculty_profiles/jacob-s-sherkow/
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 804
Downloads: 105
Download Rank: 180,126
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.266 seconds