Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2022476
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



New Evidence of the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause


Randy E. Barnett


Georgetown University Law Center

March 14, 2012

Arkansas Law Review, Vol. 55, 2003
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-045

Abstract:     
In this paper, the author advances the debate on the original meaning, interpretation, and usage of the word "commerce" in the context of the Commerce Clause. First, he distinguishes between terms that are vague and those that are ambiguous. He contends that realizing the dispute is over the ambiguity rather than the vagueness of "commerce" helps resolve the conflict between interpretations. Second, he presents the results of new empirical research into the original public meaning of "commerce" that extends well beyond the sources immediately surrounding the Constitution. Finally, the author reports the results of a similar survey of the use of the terms "regulate" and "regulation."

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: Commerce Clause, Original meaning, Constitution

JEL Classification: K00, K1, K3

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 14, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Barnett, Randy E., New Evidence of the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause (March 14, 2012). Arkansas Law Review, Vol. 55, 2003; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-045. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2022476

Contact Information

Randy E. Barnett (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9936 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.randybarnett.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 473
Downloads: 78
Download Rank: 177,312
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.656 seconds