Financial Innovation, Investor Behavior, and Arbitrage: Implications from the ETF Market
Yale University - School of Management
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Business School
March 31, 2016
Regular and levered ETFs are markedly different financial innovations. Regular ETFs improve liquidity: they are more liquid than their underlying stocks. In contrast, although the levered ETF market has a substantially higher turnover, it also has a significantly higher bid-ask spreads and larger price impacts. Our interpretation is that levered ETFs are appealing to short-term levered speculators. The aggregate cost levered ETF investors incur is around 10% of the market capitalization, or around $2 billion, each year. Moreover, regular ETF investors appear to be momentum traders, while levered ETF investors are contrarians: For regular (levered) ETFs, their monthly fund flows are strongly positively (negatively) correlated with past returns. Finally, arbitrage forces push ETF prices partially towards their NAVs, and this mechanism is less effective for levered ETFs than for regular ones.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: Financial Innovation, Leverage, Investor behavior, Index
JEL Classification: G11, G23
Date posted: March 16, 2012 ; Last revised: April 1, 2016
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds