Debt and Creative Destruction: Why Could Subsidizing Corporate Debt Be Optimal?
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business, and NBER
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
July 1, 2013
Fama-Miller Working Paper
AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings Paper
Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 12-34
We illustrate the welfare benefit of tax subsidies to corporate debt financing and study how the social cost/benefit trade-off of the subsidy changes with the duration of industry distress. To illustrate the benefit, we model two firms, which engage in a socially wasteful competition for survival in a declining industry. Firms differ on two dimensions: exogenous productivity and endogenously chosen amount of debt financing, resulting in a two dimensional war of attrition. Debt financing increases incentives to exit, which, while costly for the firm, is socially beneficial. These benefits decline as industry distress shortens, and the planner trades them off with increased costs of subsidizing corporate debt from the existing literature. In practice, debt payments are only subsidized for profitable firms — this implementation arises naturally in our normative model, even though the goal of the policy is to entice low productivity firms to take on debt.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45working papers series
Date posted: March 17, 2012 ; Last revised: February 13, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds