Subprime Mortgage Defaults and Credit Default Swaps
53 Pages Posted: 17 Mar 2012 Last revised: 23 Jan 2014
There are 2 versions of this paper
Subprime Mortgage Defaults and Credit Default Swaps
Date Written: January 15, 2012
Abstract
This paper provides the first empirical investigation of the influence of credit default swaps (CDS) on the surge in subprime mortgage defaults, which is widely believed to be a driving force in the 2008/2009 financial crisis. In the years just before the 2008/2009 financial crisis, private mortgage securitizers were eager to supply world-wide demand for trillions of dollars of “highly-rated” mortgage-backed securities (MBS) created from pools of subprime mortgage loans. The net effect was that lenders offered more and more loans to higher-risk borrowers which inevitably drove much higher subprime mortgage defaults. We argue that this chain of events was in part fueled by the simultaneous increase in the market for credit default swaps. In particular, issuers and investors in MBS could hedge the credit risk of the subprime loans underlying these securities with CDS contracts. In this way, MBS market participants could limit their exposure to the risk of securitized loans, which in turn stimulated greater demand for riskier loans, which were eagerly supplied by mortgage loan originators who earned lucrative fees. This line of reasoning therefore suggests that CDS contracts insuring MBS backed by subprime loans had a direct effect on the surge in subprime mortgage defaults. We test this prediction using a large sample of privately securitized subprime mortgages that were originated during the period from 2003 to 2007. We find that CDS coverage increases the probability of subprime loan delinquency by 3.2% to 5.4%, or an additional $9.9 billion to $13.3 billion in delinquent loan value. The negative effect of CDS coverage on loan performance is similar across loan types, and is robust to correction for endogeneity of CDS coverage and to alternative definitions of concurrent CDS coverage. Taken together, we find strong evidence that CDS coverage had a significant effect on the subprime mortgage crisis.
Keywords: Subprime mortgage default, Credit default swaps, Securitization
JEL Classification: G22, G30, G32, G38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Did Securitization Lead to Lax Screening? Evidence from Subprime Loans
By Benjamin J. Keys, Tanmoy K. Mukherjee, ...
-
The Consequences of Mortgage Credit Expansion: Evidence from the U.S. Mortgage Default Crisis
By Atif R. Mian and Amir Sufi
-
The Consequences of Mortgage Credit Expansion: Evidence from the 2007 Mortgage Default Crisis
By Atif R. Mian and Amir Sufi
-
Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
By Yuliya Demyanyk and Otto Van Hemert
-
Assessing High House Prices: Bubbles, Fundamentals, and Misperceptions
-
Assessing High House Prices: Bubbles, Fundamentals, and Misperceptions
-
Understanding the Securitization of Subprime Mortgage Credit
By Adam B. Ashcraft and Til Schuermann
-
Housing Supply and Housing Bubbles
By Edward L. Glaeser, Joseph Gyourko, ...
-
Housing Supply and Housing Bubbles
By Edward L. Glaeser, Joseph Gyourko, ...
-
Urban Growth and Housing Supply
By Edward L. Glaeser, Joseph Gyourko, ...