Subprime Mortgage Defaults and Credit Default Swaps

53 Pages Posted: 17 Mar 2012 Last revised: 23 Jan 2014

See all articles by Eric Arentsen

Eric Arentsen

The TCW Group, Inc.

David C. Mauer

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte

Brian Rosenlund

The TCW Group, Inc.

Harold H. Zhang

University of Texas at Dallas - Naveen Jindal School of Management; China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR)

Feng Zhao

University of Texas at Dallas

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: January 15, 2012

Abstract

This paper provides the first empirical investigation of the influence of credit default swaps (CDS) on the surge in subprime mortgage defaults, which is widely believed to be a driving force in the 2008/2009 financial crisis. In the years just before the 2008/2009 financial crisis, private mortgage securitizers were eager to supply world-wide demand for trillions of dollars of “highly-rated” mortgage-backed securities (MBS) created from pools of subprime mortgage loans. The net effect was that lenders offered more and more loans to higher-risk borrowers which inevitably drove much higher subprime mortgage defaults. We argue that this chain of events was in part fueled by the simultaneous increase in the market for credit default swaps. In particular, issuers and investors in MBS could hedge the credit risk of the subprime loans underlying these securities with CDS contracts. In this way, MBS market participants could limit their exposure to the risk of securitized loans, which in turn stimulated greater demand for riskier loans, which were eagerly supplied by mortgage loan originators who earned lucrative fees. This line of reasoning therefore suggests that CDS contracts insuring MBS backed by subprime loans had a direct effect on the surge in subprime mortgage defaults. We test this prediction using a large sample of privately securitized subprime mortgages that were originated during the period from 2003 to 2007. We find that CDS coverage increases the probability of subprime loan delinquency by 3.2% to 5.4%, or an additional $9.9 billion to $13.3 billion in delinquent loan value. The negative effect of CDS coverage on loan performance is similar across loan types, and is robust to correction for endogeneity of CDS coverage and to alternative definitions of concurrent CDS coverage. Taken together, we find strong evidence that CDS coverage had a significant effect on the subprime mortgage crisis.

Keywords: Subprime mortgage default, Credit default swaps, Securitization

JEL Classification: G22, G30, G32, G38

Suggested Citation

Arentsen, Eric and Mauer, David C. and Rosenlund, Brian and Zhang, Harold Huibing and Zhao, Feng, Subprime Mortgage Defaults and Credit Default Swaps (January 15, 2012). AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2023682 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2023682

Eric Arentsen

The TCW Group, Inc. ( email )

Los Angeles, CA
United States

David C. Mauer (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte ( email )

9201 University City Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28223
United States
704-687-7707 (Phone)

Brian Rosenlund

The TCW Group, Inc. ( email )

865 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
United States

Harold Huibing Zhang

University of Texas at Dallas - Naveen Jindal School of Management ( email )

P.O. Box 830688
Richardson, TX 75083-0688
United States

China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR)

1954 Huashan Road
Shanghai P.R.China, 200030
China

Feng Zhao

University of Texas at Dallas ( email )

2601 North Floyd Road
Richardson, TX 75083
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
442
Abstract Views
4,248
Rank
49,324
PlumX Metrics