Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (4)



 


 



Investor Horizon and Innovation: Evidence from Private Equity Funds


Jean-Noel Barrot


HEC Paris

December 5, 2012

Paris December 2012 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-AFFI Paper
AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings Paper

Abstract:     
Investments exploring new ideas typically take more time to payo than investments exploiting existing ones. Hence, investor with a short term horizon might be tilted towards the latter. I test this idea in the context of private equity funds, which generally have a limited investment horizon contractually ex ante. I use between and within fund variations in investment horizon to do so. I show that funds with a longer horizon select younger companies at an earlier stage of their development, stage investment more and hold on to their investments for a longer period of time. Moreover, companies which receive funding from funds with a longer horizon increase their patent stock signicantly more than companies which receive funding from short horizon investors. Altogether, these results provide new evidence on the behavior of private equity funds throughout their life cycle and suggest that investor horizon matters to an important extent for the funding of corporate innovation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: private equity, venture capital, compensation, investor horizon

JEL Classification: G24

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 19, 2012 ; Last revised: December 20, 2012

Suggested Citation

Barrot, Jean-Noel, Investor Horizon and Innovation: Evidence from Private Equity Funds (December 5, 2012). Paris December 2012 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-AFFI Paper; AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2024601 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2024601

Contact Information

Jean-Noel Barrot (Contact Author)
HEC Paris (Groupe HEC) ( email )
1 rue de la Liberation
Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, 78351
France

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 687
Downloads: 183
Download Rank: 81,596
Footnotes:  4
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.657 seconds