Real Remedies for Virtual Injuries
Brooklyn Law School
March 19, 2012
North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 90, 2012
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 267
Social networking, which offers enhancements to human lives at a low marginal cost, also contributes to dignitary and other nonpecuniary harms. Statements and images presented in electronic media can give rise to defamation, invasion of privacy, trademark infringement, and false advertising claims. Accurate enough as descriptions of harm, these doctrines do not do an adequate job of repair. An injurious communication preserved by electronic means and distributed through social networking is more likely than its spoken or paper-written counterpart to spread (a phenomenon expressed in the metaphoric adjective “viral”), to reach people whose disesteem the victim cares about, and to retain power to inflict more harm after it has been adjudicated as unlawful. Injuries in the virtual realm call for remedies that recognize how information travels through — and lingers inside — electronic media. After summarizing how current remedies for virtual injuries fail to effect repair, this Article proposes a court-annexed alternative dispute resolution scheme.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: virtual, Internet, social network, defamation, privacy, trademark, alternative dispute resolution, First Amendment
Date posted: March 16, 2012 ; Last revised: August 21, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.454 seconds