Neither Rules Nor Standards
Brooklyn Law School
March 16, 2012
Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, p. 537, 2011
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 271
Specifying the content of a requirement or a prohibition up front — e.g. replacing a “reasonable speed” requirement with a fifty-five miles per hour speed limit — can make life easier for enforcers and citizens alike. Recent efforts to substitute international tax rules for decades-old standards may do just the opposite, jeopardizing the “miracle” that is today’s international tax regime. Enhanced information exchange and formulary apportionment will undermine the legitimacy that is essential to the success of any international legal regime. A better solution would overhaul the century-old benefits principle to weave enforcement deep into the fabric of the international tax regime. Only then will it meet today’s tests as successfully as it once rose to the challenge of double taxation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: international tax, tax policy, transfer pricing, tax evasion, benefits principle, rules, standardsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 18, 2012 ; Last revised: February 19, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.312 seconds