Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2025970
 
 

Footnotes (211)



 


 



No More Chipping Away: The Roberts Court Uses an Axe to Take Out the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule


Tracey Maclin


Boston University - School of Law

Jennifer Marie Rader


affiliation not provided to SSRN

March 19, 2012

Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 81, No. 5, p. 151, 2012
Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-13

Abstract:     
This article considers the current status of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule under the Roberts Court, as well as what the future holds for the rule. Despite Justice Kennedy’s 2006 declaration that “the continued operation of the exclusionary rule, as settled and defined by our precedents, is not in doubt,” this Article demonstrates why this is not the case. Kennedy’s statement is noteworthy and has been accorded substantial weight primarily because it was made at a time when it was thought that four Justices (Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito) were prepared to announce the demise of the exclusionary rule. Part I of the article provides the background for the Court’s recent suppression rulings and Kennedy’s 2006 statement. Part II then considers the substance and worth of Kennedy’s statement as it pertains to Davis v. United States and Herring v. United States, the Court’s most recent rulings on the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. Part III considers the meaning of Kennedy’s statement in light of the attenuation rule announced in Hudson v. Michigan, which imposed a significant restriction on suppression as a remedy to deter Fourth Amendment violations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, Exclusionary Rule, Roberts Court, Davis v. United States, Herring v. United States, Hudson v. Michigan

JEL Classification: K19, K39, K49

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 19, 2012 ; Last revised: April 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Maclin, Tracey and Rader, Jennifer Marie, No More Chipping Away: The Roberts Court Uses an Axe to Take Out the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule (March 19, 2012). Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 81, No. 5, p. 151, 2012; Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-13. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2025970

Contact Information

Tracey Maclin (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-4888 (Phone)
Jennifer Marie Rader
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,027
Downloads: 230
Download Rank: 79,107
Footnotes:  211

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.343 seconds