Response: One Market We Do Not Need

Giovanna Shay

affiliation not provided to SSRN


University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, Vol. 160, p. 319, 2012
Western New England University School of Law Paper No. 12-5

The author responds to Alexander Volokh’s, Prison Vouchers, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 779 (2012). She argues that Professor Volokh is right that American prisons are considered to be “low quality,” and that they suffer from “high violence rates, bad medical care, [and] overuse of highly punitive measures like administrative segregation . . . .” But his proposed solution — a system of “prison vouchers” that would permit prisoners to choose their facilities and thus create a market for prison services — would provide only an illusion of choice. Even worse, such a system runs the risk of strengthening the self-interested forces that drive our overgrown system of incarceration. Just when it seems the United States may finally be turning away from its over-reliance on incarceration, Professor Volokh's "prison vouchers" proposal runs the risk of kick-starting prison growth.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: prison, prison vouchers, incarceration, Alexander Volokh

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 21, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Shay, Giovanna, Response: One Market We Do Not Need (2012). University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, Vol. 160, p. 319, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2026200

Contact Information

Giovanna E. Shay (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 546
Downloads: 27

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.328 seconds