Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2027121
 
 

Footnotes (165)



 


 



Does Living by the Sword Mean Dying by the Sword?


Charles Chernor Jalloh


Assistant Professor and Buchanan, Ingersoll and Rooney Faculty Scholar, University of Pittsburgh School of Law and Visiting Associate Professor, FIU College of Law

March 21, 2012

Penn State Law Review, Vol. 117, p. 707, 2013
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-07

Abstract:     
What do serial killer Ted Bundy, 9/11 terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui and alleged “Butcher of the Balkans” Slobodan Milošević have in common? Besides being accused of perpetrating some of the worst crimes known to law, they each insisted on representing themselves in court without the assistance of a lawyer. Not surprisingly, Bundy and Moussaoui were convicted. And although Milošević died just before trial judgment was rendered, it is widely speculated that he too would have been convicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.

This article examines the right to self-representation in international criminal law. Using a comparative law methodology, it demonstrates how the interpretation of that right in international penal courts initially borrowed heavily from U.S. common law and later European civil law to address the problems caused by self-representing, disruptive, and uncooperative defendants. Although the right to self-representation is a Sixth Amendment right in U.S. law, and an equally fundamental one in international criminal law, I argue that it is the type of right that is better in theory than in practice. Since no self-representing defendant in international criminal law has ever succeeded in securing an acquittal, by choosing to represent themselves, accused persons who lack the distance, ability and experience raising a reasonable doubt in a complex criminal trial help pave the way to their own convictions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: International Criminal Law, Criminal Law, right to counsel, right to self-representation, court-appointed counsel, standby counsel, counsel as amicus curiae, duty counsel, Prosecutor v. Milosevic, Prosecutor v. Barayagwiza, Prosecutor v. Norman, Prosecutor v. Taylor

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 22, 2012 ; Last revised: July 31, 2013

Suggested Citation

Jalloh, Charles Chernor, Does Living by the Sword Mean Dying by the Sword? (March 21, 2012). Penn State Law Review, Vol. 117, p. 707, 2013; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2027121 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027121

Contact Information

Charles Chernor Jalloh (Contact Author)
Assistant Professor and Buchanan, Ingersoll and Rooney Faculty Scholar, University of Pittsburgh School of Law and Visiting Associate Professor, FIU College of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-1490 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 676
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 216,141
Footnotes:  165

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds