Humanitarian Engagement Under Counter-Terrorism: A Conﬂict of Norms and the Emerging Policy Landscape
Naz K. Modirzadeh
Harvard Law School, HLS-Brookings Project on Law and Security
Dustin A. Lewis
Harvard Law School Program on International Law and Armed Conflict (PILAC)
Harvard University - Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research
March 23, 2012
International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 883, September 2011
This article identiﬁes two countervailing sets of norms – one promoting humanitarian engagement with non-state armed groups (NSAGs) in armed conﬂict in order to protect populations in need, and the other prohibiting such engagement with listed ‘terrorist’ groups in order to protect security – and discusses how this conﬂict of norms might affect the capacity of humanitarian organizations to deliver life-saving assistance in areas under the control of one of these groups. Rooted in international humanitarian law (IHL), the ﬁrst set of norms provides a basis for humanitarian engagement with NSAGs in non-international armed conﬂict for the purpose of assisting populations under their control and promoting compliance with the rules of IHL. The second set of rules attempts to curtail ﬁnancial and other forms of material support, including technical training and co-ordination, to listed ‘terrorist’ organizations, some of which may qualify as NSAGs under IHL. The article highlights counter-terrorism regulations developed by the United States and the United Nations Security Council, though other states and multilateral bodies have similar regulations. The article concludes by sketching ways in which humanitarian organizations might respond to the identiﬁed tensions.
Keywords: humanitarian action, counterterrorism, international humanitarian law, material support, humanitarian policyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 25, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds