Abstract

 


 



Income Inequality in the U.S.: The Kuznets Hypothesis Revisited


Andre V. Mollick


University of Texas - Pan American - College of Business Administration - Department of Economics & Finance

2012

Economic Systems, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
Using annual data from 1919 to 2002, the structural transformation hypothesis proposed by Simon Kuznets helps explain the U-shape of U.S. top 1% or 0.01% income share distributions. Flexible autoregressive lag representations are employed and generalized methods of moments reinforce our results. First, as the employment share in goods producing activities falls, income inequality increases in the long run. Second, federal top taxation has only short-term negative impacts. Third, these major results hold to business cycle controls (linear time trend and real output fluctuations) and to robustness checks of structural changes documented for the U.S. economy around the late 1970s.

Keywords: Kuznets hypothesis, Progressive taxation, Structural transformation, Top percentile income shares, U-shape

JEL Classification: D31, O14

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: March 26, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Mollick, Andre V., Income Inequality in the U.S.: The Kuznets Hypothesis Revisited (2012). Economic Systems, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2029091

Contact Information

Andre V. Mollick (Contact Author)
University of Texas - Pan American - College of Business Administration - Department of Economics & Finance ( email )
1201 W. University Drive
Edinburg, TX 78539-2999
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 152

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds