Rehabilitating Tinker: A Modest Proposal to Protect Public-School Students’ First Amendment Free-Expression Rights in the Digital Age
Aaron J. Hersh
University of Iowa - College of Law
March 27, 2012
98 Iowa L. Rev. 1309 (2013)
The First Amendment provides limited free-expression protections for public-school students, though the Supreme Court precedent on the issue is limited to four cases. None of these opinions enunciate the breadth of students’ free-expression rights for online, off-campus expression. As a result of this shortcoming, multiple circuit courts have reached conflicting conclusions when called on to determine whether schools have violated students’ rights when school administrators punish students for online expression. This inconsistency contributes to confusion — among students, school administrators, and the public at large — that threatens to undermine students’ First Amendment rights. In order to ameliorate this problem, this Note proposes a modified approach that reinvigorates the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District standard. This standard would only allow school administrators to regulate off-campus, online student expression that infringes on the rights of other students or otherwise would seriously disrupt the operation of the school in ways that Tinker countenanced.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: First Amendment, Social Networking, Free Expression, Public Schoolworking papers series
Date posted: March 29, 2012 ; Last revised: April 21, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds