Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2029974
 


 



Comparative Philology and a Novel by Karl Marx


Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay


Indian Statistical Institute

March 27, 2000

OYtiHaSik SObdobidda o Karl Marx-er eKTi uponnaS.[ Comparative Philology and a Novel by Karl Marx] Carnagor. Vol. I. (pp. 54-58).

Abstract:     
If Chomskian hypothesis of Universal Grammar is to be believed, there is no way to accept epiphenomenal genealogical classification based on the substantial arbitrary signs. One may also link the non-discursive political gaze, as Said did in his 1978 book, with the discursive formation of EL-centric “genealogical” order of things. However, critical apprehension or negation of such discipline, strategically (not epistemologically) speaking, is too difficult even after the two revolutions in Linguistics (Saussure and Chomsky) or after Derrida’s critical attack (1998) to this discipline as a good number of scholars are still perceiving pre-figuration of linguistics in Philology and they brand it as something called “Historical Linguistics”.
It is matter of wonder that, when the exponents of Comparative Philology like Jakob Grimm (1785-1863), Rasmus Rask (1787-1832), Franz Bopp (1791-1867), August Friedrich Pott (1802-1887) were reigning in Germany, Karl marx developed a critical negation of this discipline. When Marx published his Book of Verse (1837), he included few chapters of his “humoristic” novel Scorpion and Felix as a supplement. This paper analyzes the discourse of the Chapter 21 (Philological Broodings) of this novel to understand the contemporary critique of this discipline at the time of its inception. Marx developed a parody-text of neo-grammarians’ philological texts, i.e., he took the way of, what Derrida (1982) called as, “double sessions/writings”— a strategy of repeating/mirroring the “original text” to reveal the internal non-coherence of the text. This paper re-reads this parody by repeating the parody in another representative form. However, this paper is not a parody-text as it is impossible to compose parody of parody-text — one cannot deconstruct parody and that is the failure of deconstructive strategy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: Parody Text, Double Session, Deconstruction

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Bandyopadhyay, Debaprasad, Comparative Philology and a Novel by Karl Marx (March 27, 2000). OYtiHaSik SObdobidda o Karl Marx-er eKTi uponnaS.[ Comparative Philology and a Novel by Karl Marx] Carnagor. Vol. I. (pp. 54-58).. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2029974

Contact Information

Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay (Contact Author)
Indian Statistical Institute ( email )
203 B.T. Road
Baranagar
Kolkata, West Bengal 700108
India
+919830630707 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://plus.google.com/105852625753454780106/about
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 776
Downloads: 25

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.531 seconds