Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983
 


 



Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Australia Bank


Wulf A. Kaal


University of St. Thomas, Minnesota - School of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Richard W. Painter


University of Minnesota Law School

2012

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 97, 2012
U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-12
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-16

Abstract:     
In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, the U.S. Supreme Court in 2010 held that U.S. securities laws apply only to securities transactions within the United States.

The transactional test in Morrison could be relatively short lived because it is rooted in geography. For cases involving private securities transactions in which geographic determinants of a transaction and thus applicable law are unclear, this article suggests redirecting the inquiry away from the geographic location of securities transactions towards the parties’ choice of law. In the long run, allowing parties to choose the law pertaining to private transactions could be more effective than relying on geography that is both indeterminate and easy to manipulate. Jurisdictions could then compete to induce transacting parties to bring private transactions within their jurisdictional reach by designing substantive law and procedures that parties choose ex-ante ("Choice of Law Competition”).

Recent cases expanding the jurisdictional reach of Dutch courts suggest that the Netherlands or another EU member state could engage in a different type of jurisdictional competition. Jurisdictions performing this role adjust their procedural rules to set up a forum within their borders for litigation that appeals to plaintiffs and their lawyers ("Forum Competition"). The U.S. engaged in some Forum Competition for extraterritorial securities litigation prior to Morrison, and the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 empowers the SEC to continue to bring suits in the United States over securities transactions outside the United States. For many issuers and investors who do not choose the forum ex-ante, Forum Competition can be suboptimal. Depending on future developments, the acceptable outer bounds of Forum Competition between the United States and Europe may need to be defined by treaty or multilateral agreement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: securities, securities law, securities regulation, securities and jurisdiction, securities and choice of law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 27, 2012 ; Last revised: November 21, 2012

Suggested Citation

Kaal , Wulf A. and Painter, Richard W., Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Australia Bank (2012). Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 97, 2012; U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-12; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2029983

Contact Information

Wulf A. Kaal (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota - School of Law ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) ( email )
c/o ECARES ULB CP 114
B-1050 Brussels
Belgium
Richard W. Painter
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-626-9707 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,647
Downloads: 264
Download Rank: 65,066

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds