Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030422
 


 



Innovation and Antitrust Policy


Thomas F. Cotter


University of Minnesota Law School

March 28, 2012

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-14

Abstract:     
In this chapter from the forthcoming Oxford Handbook on Antitrust Economics (Roger D. Blair & D. Daniel Sokol eds. 2012), I argue that antitrust can play a limited but non-negligible role in fostering innovation in three principal ways. First, and as a general matter, antitrust promotes innovation when it performs its traditional role of penalizing practices such as horizontal price fixing and other anticompetitive practices that offer no plausible procompetitive justification, even when such practices happen to involve intellectual property rights (IPRs). As a general matter, in other words, antitrust should avoid IP exceptionalism. Second, however, in some limited contexts, antitrust should deviate from this general standard by showing greater leniency toward joint conduct, for example on the part of standard setting organization members, that is intended to make new technology more widely available. Third, in yet more limited contexts, antitrust should deviate from the general standard in the opposite direction, by playing a more aggressive role in circumstances in which the conduct at issue poses even an objectively small risk to future innovation, if that risk (should it come to pass) threatens substantial social harm, and decisionmakers can be confident that the potential procompetitive benefits of tolerating the conduct at issue are only modest. For the most part, however, to the extent patent and other IP laws are perceived as conferring excessive protection or otherwise as undermining, rather than advancing, their stated purpose of promoting the progress of science and the useful arts, reform must come from the IP side, not the antitrust side. Antitrust’s role in promoting innovation is important but nevertheless constrained by the limited reach of the statute and by courts’ competence to second-guess legislative judgments about the appropriate scope of IPRs.

Keywords: antitrust, patents, innovation

working papers series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 28, 2012 ; Last revised: June 25, 2012

Suggested Citation

Cotter, Thomas F., Innovation and Antitrust Policy (March 28, 2012). Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030422 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2030422

Contact Information

Thomas F. Cotter (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-7527 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 704
Downloads: 0

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds