Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030700
 


 



Case Study: Cross - Border Surveillance vs. Discreet Surveillance


Laurentiu Chipurici


affiliation not provided to SSRN

July 14, 2010

Revista de Investigare a Criminalitatii, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2010

Abstract:     
Free movement of persons without checks at the common borders. This is one of the benefits of being a part of the Schengen Area. In order to ensure an area of freedom, security and justice, the European Union designed and implemented compensatory measures to facilitate only the free movement of persons, not the free movement of criminality. The cross-border surveillance and the discreet surveillance are two instruments at the disposal of those who fight against criminality, which nowadays is not only a national problem, but a widespread interconnected phenomenon.

Keywords: cross-border criminality, surveillance, police check, bilateral agreement, convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, Schengen Information System

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 29, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Chipurici, Laurentiu, Case Study: Cross - Border Surveillance vs. Discreet Surveillance (July 14, 2010). Revista de Investigare a Criminalitatii, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030700

Contact Information

Laurentiu Chipurici (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 193

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.672 seconds