|
||||
|
||||
Re C (Welfare of Child: Immunisation) – Room to Refuse? Immunisation, Welfare and the Role of Parental Decision MakingKath O'DonnellUniversity of Hull March 29, 2012 Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 213-229, 2004 Abstract: Disputes between parents over routine childhood immunisation raise questions about the justiciability of minor issues of medical treatment and the courts’ handling of parental decisions. This commentary on the first instance and Court of Appeal judgments in Re C argues that the construction of welfare frequently deployed in such disputes is a narrow and individualistic one which privileges medical best interests and norms over a wider conception of welfare, and fails to take sufficient account of rights-based arguments.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17 Keywords: family law, child law, immunisation, welfare, parental decision making Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 29, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.438 seconds