Abstract

 


 



Re C (Welfare of Child: Immunisation) – Room to Refuse? Immunisation, Welfare and the Role of Parental Decision Making


Kath O'Donnell


University of Hull

March 29, 2012

Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 213-229, 2004

Abstract:     
Disputes between parents over routine childhood immunisation raise questions about the justiciability of minor issues of medical treatment and the courts’ handling of parental decisions. This commentary on the first instance and Court of Appeal judgments in Re C argues that the construction of welfare frequently deployed in such disputes is a narrow and individualistic one which privileges medical best interests and norms over a wider conception of welfare, and fails to take sufficient account of rights-based arguments.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: family law, child law, immunisation, welfare, parental decision making

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: March 29, 2012  

Suggested Citation

O'Donnell, Kath, Re C (Welfare of Child: Immunisation) – Room to Refuse? Immunisation, Welfare and the Role of Parental Decision Making (March 29, 2012). Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 213-229, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030749

Contact Information

Kath O'Donnell (Contact Author)
University of Hull ( email )
Cottingham Road
Hull, Great Britain HU6 7RX
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 308
Downloads: 2

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.438 seconds