Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030796
 


 



Re O and N; Re B – Uncertain Evidence and Risk-Taking in Child Protection Cases


Mary Hayes


Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Sheffield; Visiting Professor, University of Swansea

March 29, 2012

Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 63-86, 2004

Abstract:     
This commentary critically examines how the House of Lords, when faced with uncertain facts, has applied different standards of proof at the threshold and welfare stages of care proceedings. It proposes that the ‘real possibility’ test should be applied at all stages of the proceedings. This test strikes the correct balance between protecting children from future risk and interfering, perhaps wrongly, in their lives and in the lives of their parents. However, where there is uncertainty about whether a child has been harmed, or uncertainty about who caused the harm, great caution is needed before family ties are seriously disrupted or terminated. A care plan that protects the child from danger, and no more, may be all that is permitted by Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950. Proportionality in the face of uncertainty requires that the door is left open to a child’s eventual re-integration with her family. This will normally, although not necessarily, be in the interests of the child.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: family law, child law, child protection, uncertain evidence, threshold, care proceedings, welfare stages

working papers series


Date posted: March 29, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Hayes, Mary, Re O and N; Re B – Uncertain Evidence and Risk-Taking in Child Protection Cases (March 29, 2012). Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 63-86, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030796

Contact Information

Mary Hayes (Contact Author)
Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Sheffield; Visiting Professor, University of Swansea ( email )
Crookesmoor Building, Conduit Road
Sheffield S10 1FL
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 323
Downloads: 1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds