Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2031136
 


 



A Dangerous Distinction: The Deconstitutionalization of Private Speech


Derigan Silver


University of Denver Department of Media, Film and Journalism Studies; University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Ruth Walden


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Journalism and Mass Communications

March 29, 2012

Commonlaw Conspectus Vol. 21, 2012

Abstract:     
In the mid-1960s the U.S. Supreme Court began applying a Meiklejohnian approach to certain First Amendment claims, using a self-government rationale to justify enhanced protection for freedom of expression on matters of public concern in cases involving defamation, false light invasion of privacy, government employees’ speech, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, as well as others. The Court, however, refrained from acknowledging the remainder of Meiklejohn’s argument — that private speech is outside the purview of the First Amendment and protected only by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In the wake of Supreme Court defamation rulings in the 1980s, some lower courts have begun “deconstitutionalizing” private defamatory speech, holding such speech is not entitled to constitutional protection. Further complicating matters is the question of whether the First Amendment applies differently to nonmedia defendants. This study explores these developments, finding that in defamation cases involving private plaintiffs and matters of private concern, some lower federal courts and state appellate courts have 1) refused to declare that the First Amendment prohibits liability for true defamatory speech, 2) held that the Constitution does not require any proof of fault, and 3) ruled there is no constitutional protection for opinion. The article concludes that removing First Amendment protection for private speech is normatively unjustified and practically dangerous and recommends a solution to halt the deconstitutionalization of private speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: First Amendment, Defamation, Fault, Opinion, Nonmedia defendants

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 31, 2012 ; Last revised: April 10, 2013

Suggested Citation

Silver, Derigan and Walden, Ruth, A Dangerous Distinction: The Deconstitutionalization of Private Speech (March 29, 2012). Commonlaw Conspectus Vol. 21, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2031136 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2031136

Contact Information

Derigan Silver (Contact Author)
University of Denver Department of Media, Film and Journalism Studies ( email )
2490 S. Gaylord St.
Denver, CO 80208-5000
United States
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
Ruth Walden
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Journalism and Mass Communications ( email )
Carroll Hall
Campus Box 3365
Chapel Hill, NC 27514-3365
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 324
Downloads: 30

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds