Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2031215
 


 



Astrue v. Capato Argument Recap: Old Law, New Technology, and Social Security Benefits


Kristine S. Knaplund


Pepperdine University School of Law

2012

SCOTUSblog, March 22, 2012
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012/15

Abstract:     
In this, the second in a series of SCOTUSblog postings discussing the 2012 Supreme Court case of Astrue v. Capato, Professor Knaplund summarizes counsel's oral arguments before the Court. The arguments focused on Congressional intent in enacting the Social Security Act, and specifically the meaning of the word "child" in the statute. How the word "child" is defined directly affects the outcome of the case, in which the legal issue is whether a "postmortem conception" child (which is conceived using the decedent's genetic material) is eligible to receive the decedent's Social Security benefits.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Keywords: Supreme Court, child, parent, Social Security, benefit, decedent, postmortem, conception, conceive, state law, federal law, federalism, assisted reproduction, ART

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 29, 2012 ; Last revised: September 30, 2012

Suggested Citation

Knaplund, Kristine S., Astrue v. Capato Argument Recap: Old Law, New Technology, and Social Security Benefits (2012). SCOTUSblog, March 22, 2012; Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012/15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2031215

Contact Information

Kristine S. Knaplund (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 341
Downloads: 49

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.265 seconds