Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2031307
 


 



The Perils of Social Reading


Neil M. Richards


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

March 29, 2012

101 Georgetown Law Journal 689 (2013).

Abstract:     
Our law currently treats records of our reading habits under two contradictory rules: rules mandating confidentiality and rules permitting disclosure. Recently, the rise of the social Internet has created more of these records and more pressures on when and how they should be shared. Companies like Facebook, in collaboration with many newspapers, have ushered in the era of “social reading,” in which what we read may be “frictionlessly shared” with our friends and acquaintances. Disclosure and sharing are on the rise.

This Article sounds a cautionary note about social reading and frictionless sharing. Social reading might have some appeal, but the ways in which we set up the defaults for sharing matter a great deal. Our reader records implicate our intellectual privacy — the protection of reading from surveillance and interference so that we can read freely, widely, and without inhibition. I argue that the choices we make about how to share have real consequences and that frictionless sharing is neither frictionless nor is it really “sharing,” at least as we typically understand the term. The sharing of our reading habits is special. Such sharing should be conscious and only occur after meaningful notice.

The stakes in this debate are immense. We are quite literally rewiring the public and private spheres for a new century. Choices we make now — about the boundaries between our individual and social selves, between consumers and companies, and between citizens and the state — will have unforeseeable ramifications for the societies our children and grandchildren inherit. Even the setting of defaults we can opt out of will shape behavior and establish baselines of “normal” for our societies. We should make choices that preserve our intellectual privacy, not destroy it. This Article suggests practical ways to do just that.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Privacy, Intellectual Privacy, Facebook, Social Readers, Reading, Confidentiality, Data Protection, Sensitive Data

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 30, 2012 ; Last revised: March 19, 2013

Suggested Citation

Richards, Neil M., The Perils of Social Reading (March 29, 2012). 101 Georgetown Law Journal 689 (2013).. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2031307

Contact Information

Neil M. Richards (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,135
Downloads: 1,106
Download Rank: 9,092

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.437 seconds