Academic Freedom in New Haven and Singapore
National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law
March 30, 2012
Straits Times, 30 March 2012, page A23
Academic freedom entails certain rights — but it also comes with responsibilities and requires an understanding of context. The rights generally associated with academic freedom are that teaching and research should be conducted without unreasonable interference or restriction by the law, institutional regulations, or public pressure. The qualification “unreasonable” is important as this is not an absolute right. Academic freedom does not entitle you to experiment on non-consenting human subjects. An academic who falsifies results should expect disciplinary action; one who does not show up for class should not expect to get a promotion or a pay raise. But beyond such clear cases, professors should be free — and encouraged — to pursue the truth wherever it leads. There are many examples of what happens in the absence of such freedom. Think astronomy under the Catholic Church at the time of Galileo, or biology in the Soviet Union.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 1
Keywords: academic freedom, Singapore, New Haven, YaleAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 30, 2012 ; Last revised: April 30, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.296 seconds