|
||||
|
||||
Collective Responsibility and National ResponsibilityRoland PierikUniversity of Amsterdam Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, (2008, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 465-483) Abstract: In his recent book, National Responsibility and Global Justice, David Miller conceptualizes and justifies a model of national responsibility. His conceptualization proceeds in two steps: he starts by developing two models of collective responsibility, the like-minded group model and the cooperative practice model. He then proceeds to discuss national responsibility, a species of collective responsibility, and argues that nations have features such that the two models of collective responsibility also apply to them. In this article, I focus on the question whether Miller’s like-minded group model and the cooperative practice model are plausible and convincing models of collective responsibility. I will argue that the like-minded model does not provide a plausible conceptualization of collective responsibility, while the collective practice model provides a good model for collective responsibility but is not particularly helpful in conceptualizing national responsibility.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19 Keywords: collective responsibility, David Miller, agency, state responsibility Date posted: April 2, 2012 ; Last revised: April 3, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.297 seconds